http://www.photographybay.com/2007/03/04/nikon-d3-coming/ Press images of the Nikon D3

1. Clearly you don’t have a clue either. Canon EF lenses were introduced in 1987 with the first EOS cameras and were compatible with only those EOS cameras. Canon’s previous line (the T50/T70/T90) used the older FD lenses that were also used by the cameras of the 1970s (ala A1, AE1 …) .

   Posted by jgrowl | August 6, 2008, 4:51 pm

2. Want that so hard but very expensive.

   Posted by repe112 | August 7, 2008, 11:35 pm

3. Dream Nikon D4 has 27.2 MP

   Posted by ZhaoSing | August 11, 2008, 6:13 am

4. You should have directed this directly to me, it’s in the wrong spot.

   But, I stand by what I said.

   Posted by BillieBobSmith | August 12, 2008, 9:04 pm

5. You’re obviously not a Pro photographer. Your comments regarding Canon’s are beyond ridiculous and clearly show that you don’t what the hell you’re talking about. I own both the Nikon D3 and Canon 1Ds Mark 2 and both are excellent. Both have their strengths and weaknesses. I don’t understand you guys who make such stupid comments about something you know absolutely nothing about.

   Posted by ppolgar | August 15, 2008, 3:25 pm

6. canon’s only decent camera is the mark 3.

   NIKON RULE

   Posted by Mcbozburger | August 17, 2008, 8:18 am

7. It looks awesome with the long lens!

   Posted by coolchef1337 | August 19, 2008, 12:39 am

8. Oh no, the D60 is way ahead of the D3!!!

   Nah, just kidding! If you’re new to DSRL (perhaps you’re in the market for one?) then the D60 will do fine - no need to pay 4500 dollars extra for a camera that you’d first have to learn how to use (D60 can go AUTO) and then the D3 would not come with a lens either! Then you’d have to buy a proper lens (1-2000 dollars extra again).

   Posted by hendriksholm | August 20, 2008, 1:15 am

9. of course!!!!

   Posted by denissimonov | August 22, 2008, 6:37 am

10. I’m sorry to interrupt..does Nikkon D3 better than nikkon D60..
    sorry, new to camera..

    Posted by zentaikiss | August 25, 2008, 10:39 am

11. Analogy VHS vs BETAMAX stuff them all we now use BLU-RAY,Cameras are no different let the photos do the talking show me a published pic worth looking at,how many people are interested in quality most are in it for the money ,thats all PRO means ,dont mean you or you kit are any good,look at all the paps MONEY IS THE NAME OF THE GAME NOTHING MORE NOTHING LESS.quality is second to money,nikon,canon,pentax ,Haselblad, look at the user not the kit

    Posted by audiofreeq | August 25, 2008, 2:46 pm

12. Canon makes nothing but pieces of shit, absolutely garbage.

    Nikon is the best, always was and still is. Doesn’t matter film or digital, Nikon rules.

    Posted by BillieBobSmith | August 26, 2008, 7:41 am

13. That is one fucking sexy camera, 11 fps, 12.1 mp, duel memory cameras…. Me want…
    Nikon for life bitch.

    Posted by xXYonnyXx | August 29, 2008, 5:45 pm

14. Gerçekten harika bir slr sahip olmak isterdim do?rusu.

    Posted by lanceradil | August 30, 2008, 2:28 pm

15. In addition to that - ‘1600 ISO, tripod and remote shutter and set your aperature’ - LOL.

    i) if you’re using a tripod, why bump the ISO?
    ii) ‘remote shutter’ - is that some new age techincal term? you sure you’re not after ‘remote shutter release’ or words to that effect? hows about ‘bulb’ setting? and maybe ‘long exposure’? iii) you might want to state what ones aperture should be set to if you’re going to raise it as a valid point. f/1.2? f/64?

    The D3 can push ISO-25600 equiv FYI.

    Posted by omgwtfbbqIDK | September 1, 2008, 11:20 am

16. Clearly you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about. Canon EF lenses are compatible with all bodies since the 1970s. Nikon F-mount lesnes (dating back to 1959?) will fit on all bodies, and correctly meter on DXXX or DX (semi pro/pro) bodies. This is also true for Pentax. The ONLY brand to oust film lenses completely has been Olympus, who’ve opted for the 4/3 system.

    I don’t know why the hell you think you’d need adaptors.

    Old flashes also work just fine.

    Posted by omgwtfbbqIDK | September 4, 2008, 3:03 am

17. Ventg99 yer an idiot. all DSLR cameras are rarely compatible with old glass and definately not old flashes. It may be possible to find old glass from film cameras that could mount to your digitals through either direct threading or step up/down rings, but they’d only be useful in manual focus. I think you’re just a guy with a camera, you can’t even spell Canon properly. As for your near dark photos congrats. 1600 ISO, tripod and remote shutter and set your aperature

    Posted by Mexico911 | September 4, 2008, 7:32 pm

18. you’re a fucking idiot

    Posted by SleepStreamer89 | September 4, 2008, 10:37 pm

19. nikon is the best!!!

    Posted by kaibar25 | September 5, 2008, 8:29 am

20. how do u know

    Posted by uscgswimmer1 | September 5, 2008, 12:18 pm

21. Wath a beauty!

    Posted by lostatarlanda | September 8, 2008, 10:21 am

22. Please remember that Cannon left all pro photographers out in the cold when it came to being able to use older generation lenses. Nikon took their photographers into consideration. You can use almost all the lenses with their new camera models! The new D3 has shifted the playing field back to Nikon! Cannon has nothing that can touch it. I am a pro photographer and took a series of shots in almost total darkness. They came out great!

    Posted by ventg99 | September 11, 2008, 1:59 pm

23. wow, a nikon vs canon on youtube! amazing!

    Posted by limosalimosa | September 12, 2008, 4:14 pm

24. Love Zeiss lenses too. What digital camera do you recommend?

    Posted by clix168 | September 14, 2008, 12:09 pm

25. cheap chinease crap

    Posted by mixdur123 | September 15, 2008, 10:41 am